Most automation projects fail not because of the technology — but because nobody wrote down how the process actually works before they tried to automate it.

We've inherited a lot of broken automations. Zapier workflows that nobody understands. n8n flows built by someone who left six months ago. Make scenarios that work — mostly — and everyone's afraid to touch them.
The thing they all have in common: nobody documented the process before building the automation.
They skipped from "this is a problem" to "here's a tool" and missed the most important step in the middle.
Automating an undocumented process doesn't make it better. It makes it faster — and faster chaos is worse chaos.
Before any automation build, you need to be able to answer:
If you can't answer those questions with specifics, you're not ready to automate. You're ready to document.
It doesn't need to be a 40-page manual. It needs to be accurate.
A simple process map — even a whiteboard photo — that captures inputs, steps, decisions, outputs, and owners is more valuable than any automation tool you'll buy.
The documentation exercise almost always reveals something useful on its own:
This is the difference between an automation that runs reliably for two years and one that breaks every time something changes.
We do process documentation as part of every automation engagement we run. Not as a checkbox — as a prerequisite. Because the automation is only as good as the process underneath it.